Terence Tao: The Cosmic Distance Ladder, UCLA

UCLA · 203K views · 2010 · 1:16:17

Open on YouTube

Cosmology & astrophysicsUniversity lectures & courseslecture

Why Hacker News recommends it

HN recommends it as an accessible and elegant tour of how indirect reasoning builds up cosmic measurements, with one commenter calling it their favorite Tao work.

What it is

Terence Tao's AMS Einstein Public Lecture at UCLA on the cosmic distance ladder, the chain of methods astronomers use to measure distances from the Earth to distant galaxies. It is aimed at a general audience.

Recommended by 2 HN commenters across 2 different months, 2022 to 2025.

What Hacker News said

Strong rec mathladder · 2025-02 · on “Terence Tao on how we measure the cosmos, Part 1 [video]”

Cool collab. Tao’s oft given talk about the cosmic distance ladder has always been my favorite thing he has done. [this video]

Recommends luc4sdreyer · 2024-03 · on “Webb and Hubble confirm Universe's expansion rate”

> Nobody had a clue In the 3rd century BC, Aristarchus calculated that the Sun was between 18 and 20 times farther away from the Earth than the Moon, and proposed the Heliocentric model as a result. The true value is instead approximately 400 times. But it's incredible given that he didn't have lenses, the value of Pi, and that the Geocentric model was considered correct until 1800 years after his death. [LINK] Nice video about the cosmic distance ladder by Terence Tao: [this video]

Cites meroes · 2022-04 · on “I stopped working on black hole information loss”

My understanding of cosmology and astronomy is there is an inherent "ladder", nesting of assumptions, or indirect argument structure. Like, IF the Moon is a sphere, then by the shadows Earth leaves upon it during eclipses, Earth is a sphere. This reasoning came before Aristotle knew the Earth was sphere. [this video] This is still a way to do science. I'm willing to believe the experimenters dealt with the inherent novelty in a scientific way. What do you mean known celestial body?? We've only ever "been" to 2. We don't get to run all the experiments you'd like. As long as the process is self-correcting, it works. You have not shown this method to be uncorrecting. Better and better standards are

Cites DavidSJ · 2022-10 · on “Researcher discovers another astronomy book written by Galileo Galilei”

This very parallax effect. We know how far the Sun is from the Earth, and the Earth has moved twice this distance from January 1 to July 1. This in turn allows us to extrapolate distance to some of the nearest stars by their apparent motion relative to the other, "fixed" stars. [LINK] [this video]