IBM Computing Cheese Cutter [Restoration]
Why Hacker News recommends it
HN shares it as a fun curiosity about early IBM history, with time stamps for the nameplate and the explanation.
What it is
A 47-minute restoration of a 1920s IBM computing cheese cutter, a machine with parts patented between 1901 and 1907. The video covers the restoration work and explains why it is a computing cheese cutter.
Recommended by 1 HN commenters across 1 different months, 2021 to 2024.
What Hacker News said
Recommends kens · 2022-02 · on “IBM Plex Typeface (2018)”
I don't believe it. In particular, IBM was formed by amalgamating various subsidiary companies, so there's no "first product". Even if you focus on the Computing Scale Company, I think their first product was a computing scale and the cheese slicer was later. That said, the IBM cheese cutter restoration video is very cool: [this video]
Cites lenwood · 2021-10 · on “IBM Computing Cheese Cutter Restoration [video]”
Wow this is cool! It would be awesome to learn more about its history. The nameplate (visible at 11:10 [0]) says patented with a date of 1901, which is 10 years before IBM was founded [1]. This was curious to me so I looked up the patent [2], which was granted in 1905. Based on this it seems that IBM must have purchased the rights to this patent and that it was either made or refurbished after 1911. [0]: [this video] [1]: [LINK] [2]: [LINK]
Cites MikeTheGreat · 2024-02 · on “100 Years Ago, IBM Was Born”
Just happened to jump to the exact point where he explains why / how it's a "computing" cheese cutter; if you're curious too you can find the explanation at the 42:30 mark: [this video]
Cites bayindirh · 2024-05 · on “IBM Granite: A Family of Open Foundation Models for Code Intelligence”
IBM has a track record going back to automatically price calculating cheese cutters [0], but Sam does not. IBM has proven itself in various ways over the years, OpenAI hasn't. While IBM is a behemoth of a money making machine, they put money where their mouth is. OpenAI does not. So I'll trust IBM, but not OpenAI. [0]: [this video]