My Gift To Climate Alarmists

Tony Heller · 794K views · 2019 · 12:52

Open on YouTube

Climate policy, solutions & debateClimate science & climate changecommentarydated

Why Hacker News recommends it

Shared by climate-skeptic commenters as a counter-argument to alarmist statistics, a contested source rather than consensus.

What it is

Tony Heller presents a short video arguing that climate science relies on data truncation, cherry-picking and selective presentation of statistics. It is a one-sided polemic against mainstream climate claims.

Recommended by 3 HN commenters across 3 different months, 2019 to 2023.

What Hacker News said

Recommends PKop · 2019-09 · on “America’s Great Climate Exodus Is Starting in the Florida Keys”

Because they know it won't be under water in just a few years, and that the climate scare is selective presentation of statistics in service of propaganda to consolidate political power. Interesting view highlighting the selective presentation of statistics: [this video] President Obama is one of those who must think the sea level won't rise dramatically for a while, given he recently bought property near the ocean.

Recommends PKop · 2019-09 · on “America’s Great Climate Exodus Is Starting in the Florida Keys”

A counter-argument to climate alarmist statistics, shows use of selective presentation of statistics to portray specific conclusion on climate change: [this video]

Recommends olivermarks · 2021-07 · on “Coldest inhabited place on Earth is baking in record heat”

Climate alarmists have a poor reputation around data manipulation as this short video discussing the recent US climate assessment unpacks. [LINK] [this video] 11 year solar cycles are a split second moment in time in comparison to the longer term data which is so often cherry picked and truncated to illustrate various agendas, whether dishonest globalist energy corporate entities or climate alarmists. I'm all for responsible stewardship of the planet, but there i s no shortage of climate grifters, charlatans and hustlers out there, many of whom are actually influencing government policy and data. Unhelpful.

Recommends revelio · 2023-03 · on “IPCC climate crisis report delivers ‘final warning on 1.5C’”

It's honest. You can just click through the stories to see for yourself. Of course you can try to find one you feel is weak, cherry pick it and then try to dismiss all the others, but all those false predictions are still there and won't go away. W.R.T. the one you picked, the extinctionclock assessment is correct. The claims being made are about "deaths, hospital admissions and mental health disorders, dengue fever and gastroenteritis". Deaths from extreme weather are down drastically over time. Very unclear why they predicted a rise in mental health disorders from climate change, but nobody outside the most extremist climate change fanatics are trying to claim a link there. Contemporary di

Cites pcdoodle · 2020-03 · on “More accurate climate change model reveals bleaker outlook on electricity, water”

When did climate change get promoted to the most serious issue? I think we might have other things to worry about and I don't come here for the fear porn. [this video]

Cites TrispusAttucks · 2022-04 · on “IPCC’s starkest message yet: extreme steps needed to avert climate disaster”

I have been worried about climate change my entire life. I doom scroll news stories that show the coming disaster. Recently, I stumbled onto this video [1] and have trouble refuting the data and claims. Any experts that can explain what am I missing and why is this guy wrong? [1] [this video]