The Sinister Reason Weed is Illegal | Adam Ruins Everything

Dropout · 11.5M views · 2016 · 6:03

Open on YouTube

Law, policing & justiceWorld historySocial issues & culturecomedydated

Why Hacker News recommends it

Used as a pop-culture shorthand explanation for the political origins of drug laws.

What it is

An Adam Ruins Everything segment arguing that US cannabis prohibition grew out of racially and politically motivated agendas under Nixon and earlier, rather than scientific evidence.

Recommended by 1 HN commenters across 1 different months, 2017 to 2019.

What Hacker News said

Recommends burner831234 · 2019-09 · on “The Legal Gray Zone of Marijuana at Airports”

+1 and if you need a pop culture version to explain it to you check out [this video] (adam ruins everything) complete with references

Cites yeukhon · 2017-03 · on “Fake news is too big and messy to solve with algorithms or editors ”

News propaganda didn't just fall off a tree magically. Propaganda is common throughout history to gather supports. Fake news didn't just happen on Facebook. Mainstream media have been criticized for all forms of malpractices or unfair reporting by misquoting, taking a quote or story out of context, using unauthentic images or using different random parts of a clip to create a story. Is NYT more fair than Fox News? I recently came across a YouTube video called "The Sinter Reason Weed is Illegal" [1]. I am not a historian, but from this video I learned that perhaps the ban of cannabis was perhaps not based on scientific facts at all. The whole ban was just a political move by provoking racism

Cites gardnr · 2017-08 · on “Washington man facing prison after foraging for wild psilocybin mushrooms”

Looking at your original comment I see that message clearly now. I still wouldn't want that to constitute PC. What if I had a brown bag full of non-psychedelic mushrooms? The cops would roll up on me and search me? Worse yet, what if I inadvertently picked a psychedelic mushroom, not knowing what is is and telling myself I would ID it with a spore print at home later. Now I'm looking at prison time? I don't want my taxes to go to keeping those cases in prison. We've kind of gone off on a tangent from the original article which I am OK with. It will be a hard sell for me to agree to widening the definition of what constitutes PC. From my basic understanding being in a place or doing something