MIT ACL - Variable Pitch Quadrotor

AerospaceControlsLab · 132K views · 2011 · 2:54

Open on YouTube

RoboticsAviation & aerospace engineeringdemo

Why Hacker News recommends it

Referenced in drone threads as a demonstration that variable pitch quadcopters fly well with little drift.

What it is

A short MIT Aerospace Controls Lab demo from 2011 of a variable pitch quadrotor flying.

Recommended by 1 HN commenters across 1 different months, 2013 to 2016.

What Hacker News said

Recommends RealityVoid · 2016-10 · on “1000W LED on a Drone [video]”

The example you posted has far more things in common with a multirotor than with a helicopter. What amazes me at those little things is how little side-to-side drift they have, considering that's all depending on the CG being well centered. A nice variable pitch quad: [this video]

Cites jonmrodriguez · 2013-12 · on “Amazon Promises Package Delivery By Drone: Is It for Real?”

Are there other types of drones other than traditional quadcopters, for example variable-pitch quadcopters [1], that can get more airspeed and thus cover more distance in 15 min? What about using airplane-style drones (like traditional RC planes) + a parachute to land the package? And this way you could use nitro gas fuel to get better energy density (since you can use one big gas engine instead of having to use four tiny motors) [1] [this video]

Cites jakemoshenko · 2016-08 · on “Plasma wings could change the way airplanes are designed and flown”

Manned multicopters have already happened. [1] MIT has also demonstrated a variable pitch quadcopter. [2] If they can use plasma laminar detachment and reattachment to somehow simulate a variable pitch propeller, while still getting some weight savings over a design with multiple swashplates, then yes I think it should help the quadcopter design scale up to larger propellers. That's a big if though, since to simulate a negative angle of attack I'm guessing your propeller design would have to be pretty inefficient with all plasma turned off. I'm not entirely sure why you want this though, since the single large rotor is more efficient. There was a novel design a few years ago with one large r